e
Thursday, September 07, 2006Why would you wear a hat just to talk to God?
Consider the pants.
I was tapping away conscientiously at my keyboard this very morn when I happened to glance up and spotted 2 severe fashion faux pas trundling past, side by side. Both of said blunders involved pants.
The second blunder belonged to someone I really didn't think would be capable of such escapades. Clearly a fan of the black skirt, and generally well turned out, this was unexpected. However, the skirt today was sadly a little more sheer than any of us thought and the decision to wear big white pants beneath said skirt was not a good one. All this pant action lead me to ponder on my own pant situation. I have a plethora of said undercrackers that I really need to weed out (rather than wee on, arf arf). Buying underwear is one of those vices that I have like someone people like buying shoes or buying handbags. Oh, wait, that's me too. Although I have not been too bad of late (take note Lee).
posted by Claire @ 9/07/2006 07:20:00 am | 2 comments | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ |
||
design by marceline smith at diskant |
Haha - enjoyed reading the pant viewing action! Funnily enough, my mum and I were discussing g-strings the other day, she said 'apparently they are causing people lots of problems....' I assume this means in a medical way but I didn't like to ask....
undercrackers.. that really is my favorite of all words and it is highly underused in daily life. g-strings, or thongs if you will are my most hated version of 'undercracker' - pointless and irritating and i'm sure, dangerous in medical terms :) but that doesn't mean it's acceptable to wear hideously large panty-girdle-esk pants. a real overcompensation...